Loaded false positive study data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\HL\3.98\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequences_17.mat
max_rotation=0 r=0 n=1 a=GUAC FASTA(n).Sequence=GUAC
pJAR3DFalsePositiveStudy Timestamp 18-Jul-2025 23:24:44
Evaluating how sequences fit models
GUAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.59, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_78677.1,  3 NTs,                  UUCG,score      -5.84, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.89, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUCG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.80, deficit  0.79, CutoffScore  91.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  2.38, CutoffScore  43.40, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AUAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.24, deficit  1.04, CutoffScore  89.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.19, deficit  1.99, CutoffScore  79.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.02, deficit  1.01, CutoffScore  57.77, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.27, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.12, deficit -1.09, CutoffScore  48.31, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.30, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.40, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.40, deficit  3.20, CutoffScore  66.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.48, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  75.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUCA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.98, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  89.83, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUCU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.09, deficit  1.08, CutoffScore  88.68, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
ACAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.24, deficit -0.97, CutoffScore  47.03, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UUAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.00, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  91.53, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGUU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.08, CutoffScore  99.20, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UUUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.22, deficit  3.02, CutoffScore  68.24, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.25, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  88.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -3.20, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.55, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore  43.70, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAA 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.50, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_27483.1,  4 NTs,              GCUUCUGC,score      -4.19, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.63, deficit  3.43, CutoffScore  63.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAGA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.29, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  67.48, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.46, deficit  2.25, CutoffScore  44.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.15, deficit  1.95, CutoffScore  47.94, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.42, deficit  2.21, CutoffScore  45.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  97.65, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.05, deficit  1.85, CutoffScore  80.56, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.54, deficit  2.33, CutoffScore  43.92, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.27, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  67.82, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.50, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  75.74, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAAAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.11, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  98.75, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, CutoffScore  96.13, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUUCA 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -5.96, deficit  2.76, CutoffScore  70.98, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.26, deficit  3.06, CutoffScore  67.78, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAGCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.83, deficit  1.73, CutoffScore  50.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCCGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_46501.1,  5 NTs,                CUGAAG,score      -6.47, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  77.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-cWS                                 
GUGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -6.67, deficit -0.00, CutoffScore  68.47, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UGAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, CutoffScore  70.35, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGUGA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -5.28, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  51.48, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UAAAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -5.12, deficit  0.13, CutoffScore  98.67, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_32392.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -3.81, deficit  0.14, CutoffScore  98.51, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_26631.1,  5 NTs,                 CAGUG,score      -2.57, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AGUCU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.32, CutoffScore  65.10, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.89, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  60.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.16, CutoffScore  66.68, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  85.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
UAACA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_86870.2,  5 NTs,                GUGUUC,score      -5.41, deficit  0.11, CutoffScore  67.30, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGUC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -8.30, deficit  5.10, CutoffScore  46.35, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -3.86, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  99.22, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
CCUGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.32, deficit  1.38, CutoffScore  53.90, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUAGC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_35941.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
GCGCC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.45, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  65.85, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAUG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.46, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.77, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAUA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -7.37, deficit  0.16, CutoffScore  66.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.19, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  99.32, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GUCAC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -6.44, deficit  3.24, CutoffScore  65.87, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGUUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -4.23, deficit  0.22, CutoffScore  66.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGGUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.92, deficit  0.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGCAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UUGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.17, deficit  0.96, CutoffScore  58.32, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGCAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.18, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGUAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.80, deficit  0.71, CutoffScore  92.55, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUUCU 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  83.09, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GAUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.04, deficit  1.03, CutoffScore  89.14, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
UAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_38168.1,  3 NTs,                 CAAAG,score      -7.13, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore  77.43, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
CACAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_75660.5,  3 NTs,                 CACAG,score      -6.05, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  84.04, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CAAUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32346.4,  3 NTs,                CGGAUG,score      -5.61, deficit  1.60, CutoffScore  83.19, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -4.38, deficit  1.18, CutoffScore  87.56, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
GCGAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_22135.1,  4 NTs,                 UCCAA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.20, CutoffScore  55.84, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCUUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.13, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  58.66, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
AGGCU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.67, deficit  1.46, CutoffScore  53.00, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGUUU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -6.20, deficit  0.36, CutoffScore  64.66, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGCUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.79, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  59.45, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_80709.3,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, CutoffScore  92.32, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUGCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -8.60, deficit  1.39, CutoffScore  85.36, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUUGG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -4.95, deficit  3.01, CutoffScore  69.88, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CUCUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.23, deficit  0.55, CutoffScore  62.62, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUCGGG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.67, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  39.61, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
AGAAAU 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.27, deficit  1.51, CutoffScore  84.30, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAAGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.83, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  97.61, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGUUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_65313.1,  5 NTs,                CCUUUG,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  56.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GCGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -7.10, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  25.35, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
AUUAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.12, deficit  0.64, CutoffScore  61.64, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUUCG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.55, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  95.45, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGUCGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -7.44, deficit  1.59, CutoffScore  51.63, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUGACG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_56131.2,  4 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -9.97, deficit  2.76, CutoffScore  39.33, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CACAGG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.38, deficit  1.45, CutoffScore  53.20, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.66, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  59.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.80, deficit  4.04, CutoffScore  57.90, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -5.34, deficit  0.86, CutoffScore  59.34, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -7.82, deficit  1.88, CutoffScore  48.62, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UUUGUA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.55, deficit  0.43, CutoffScore  63.89, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
GGAAUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.28, deficit  0.15, CutoffScore  98.47, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.38, deficit  6.62, CutoffScore  31.00, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUUUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_48778.2,  3 NTs,                 CCGUG,score      -7.00, deficit  3.80, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  2, 0 cWW-F                                   
GGCUUC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_81100.2,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.17, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  65.75, ed  2, 1 cWW                                     
CGGAGG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.34, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  41.83, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUAACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.97, deficit  4.21, CutoffScore  56.09, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_55195.3,  3 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.31, deficit  3.29, CutoffScore  33.76, ed  2, 1 cWW-F                                   
UAAUUA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_29966.1,  5 NTs,                AAAUUU,score      -4.50, deficit  0.09, CutoffScore  99.08, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUUGC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -5.87, deficit  3.93, CutoffScore  60.58, ed  1, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGCAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.71, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  48.43, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.19, deficit  0.10, CutoffScore  98.97, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCAAAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.66, deficit  3.90, CutoffScore  59.31, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUCACG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.99, deficit  5.23, CutoffScore  45.50, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUCGC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_34617.5,  5 NTs,                CUUCGG,score      -2.87, deficit  0.93, CutoffScore  90.70, ed  0, 0 cWW-tSW-F                               
CGUAGG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -6.64, deficit  4.88, CutoffScore  49.18, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CAAUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_49922.4,  5 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.59, deficit  0.53, CutoffScore  62.88, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGUGAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.65, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  59.45, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUGUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.86, deficit  1.38, CutoffScore  53.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CAAAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93535.1,  6 NTs,                CAGCCG,score      -6.10, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUCAC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  68.42, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCAGUG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.97, deficit  0.38, CutoffScore  64.46, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAGCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -6.91, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  42.78, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUCAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_71391.1,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -5.81, deficit  2.01, CutoffScore  78.86, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCAAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -3.56, deficit  1.80, CutoffScore  81.22, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGAAUG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.01, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  90.73, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUUGUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_56334.1,  3 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.63, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  63.07, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CUUGAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -7.75, deficit  2.23, CutoffScore  44.99, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAACUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_82710.2,  5 NTs,                GGGAAC,score      -7.08, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  71.13, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAGUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.16, deficit  0.69, CutoffScore  61.16, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
UUGUUG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -8.50, deficit  3.03, CutoffScore  68.12, ed  1, 0 cWW-F                                   
UGUAAA 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.03, deficit  3.27, CutoffScore  65.92, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUAGAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -7.30, deficit  0.51, CutoffScore  31.46, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CAUACUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.60, deficit  1.15, CutoffScore  37.65, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAGGUGA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -9.01, deficit  3.08, CutoffScore  36.04, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUACGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66103.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -6.91, deficit  0.12, CutoffScore  67.18, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CAGUAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_80922.2,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -7.56, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  99.96, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSH-F                               
GGCGGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -7.52, deficit  1.92, CutoffScore  48.23, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAACUC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -7.81, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  61.96, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAAAGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_47854.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -9.45, deficit  4.54, CutoffScore  39.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCAACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04783.2,  5 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -9.78, deficit  3.69, CutoffScore  61.21, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGGUCAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score      -9.91, deficit  1.89, CutoffScore  55.12, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
UGGAGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_89893.1,  6 NTs,               CAGAGCG,score      -9.14, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore  39.01, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCUCAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -9.37, deficit  2.70, CutoffScore  40.03, ed  3, 1 cWW-F                                   
CGACGUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.81, deficit  0.21, CutoffScore  66.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.26, deficit -1.14, CutoffScore  48.80, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CCUGUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -7.32, deficit -0.77, CutoffScore  53.59, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
GGAGAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.95, deficit  7.19, CutoffScore  25.08, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
ACCUUUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -9.25, deficit  4.81, CutoffScore  36.79, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CUCUCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_70782.2,  3 NTs,                CCUCAG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.03, CutoffScore  57.54, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
CCUGAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -5.66, deficit  0.06, CutoffScore  72.32, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GGUUUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score      -6.54, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  57.67, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -5.67, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  59.26, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCUGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_13963.3,  4 NTs,                GGCGAC,score      -8.43, deficit  2.06, CutoffScore  46.73, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CCUUCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -6.90, deficit  0.41, CutoffScore  67.80, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.04, deficit -0.36, CutoffScore  40.62, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGACCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -8.35, deficit  4.43, CutoffScore  16.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
UGCUCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_13189.1,  4 NTs,                CCUCGG,score      -9.62, deficit  3.78, CutoffScore  28.66, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGUAGUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.83, deficit  0.23, CutoffScore  65.95, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAAGUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.49, deficit  1.02, CutoffScore  89.29, ed  0, 0 cWW-F                                   
CGAAGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -7.30, deficit  5.54, CutoffScore  42.27, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UUGAAGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_57875.1,  4 NTs,                GGUUUC,score     -10.38, deficit  4.86, CutoffScore  48.88, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_53890.2,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -7.42, deficit  1.29, CutoffScore  86.40, ed  1, 0 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUCGUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -9.44, deficit  3.96, CutoffScore  26.72, ed  1, 1 cWW-F                                   
GUUCAAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_37369.2,  7 NTs,               CGGCGAG,score      -7.17, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  71.10, ed  2, 0 cWW-tSH-F-F-F                           
UUGUUCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -7.57, deficit  1.52, CutoffScore  84.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UCGAUCA 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_65794.5,  6 NTs,                UGAUCA,score      -7.97, deficit  3.49, CutoffScore  31.66, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUAGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69752.2,  3 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -6.87, deficit  1.40, CutoffScore  22.14, ed  2, 2 cWW-F                                   
AGAUCGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -8.39, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore  18.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAUCCCG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_47787.2,  6 NTs,               CAUCCCG,score      -4.82, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  88.95, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGUGCAA 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_97917.2,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -9.36, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  26.65, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GAUCGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -7.17, deficit  0.70, CutoffScore  29.48, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_87954.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.26, deficit  0.59, CutoffScore  62.21, ed  2, 1 cWW-tSW-F                               
GUGUGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_50006.2,  4 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -9.26, deficit  1.03, CutoffScore  26.03, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUUUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_48417.5,  4 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -8.61, deficit  2.68, CutoffScore  71.81, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F                                 
GUUUGGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -7.22, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  49.20, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GUUUGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -7.11, deficit  0.63, CutoffScore  65.81, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAAGAA 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_37824.7,  6 NTs,                CGAAAG,score      -8.84, deficit  7.08, CutoffScore  26.22, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGCUCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08100.1,  5 NTs,               CCUCGCG,score      -7.61, deficit  2.52, CutoffScore  15.54, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
CGAAUCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_51447.1,  7 NTs,               CGAGUCG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.10, CutoffScore  64.63, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GCUGAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_10453.3,  7 NTs,             GCUGCGAAC,score      -6.64, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  36.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAGUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_57176.2,  5 NTs,               GCUGAUC,score      -5.67, deficit  0.07, CutoffScore  67.71, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CCCUUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.28, deficit  0.87, CutoffScore  27.64, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UAAUCCGA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -11.09, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore   6.93, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAAAAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -8.79, deficit  2.34, CutoffScore  53.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGUACGUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score      -6.93, deficit  1.36, CutoffScore  45.23, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGUUAGAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.59, deficit  2.95, CutoffScore  50.92, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CAUUGACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  59.95, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
ACUUUUCU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.53, deficit  1.71, CutoffScore  22.01, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UGCAAAAA 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.35, deficit  1.97, CutoffScore  47.72, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAUCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -13.30, deficit  6.79, CutoffScore  12.36, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUUCGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_37344.1,  6 NTs,              CCAUUCGG,score      -8.36, deficit  1.87, CutoffScore  25.76, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CACCGUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.08, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore   7.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GAAGCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -5.38, deficit  2.65, CutoffScore  54.66, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UCGAGUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.99, deficit  2.17, CutoffScore  17.40, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGCGGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -9.06, deficit  2.57, CutoffScore  14.32, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GGGAGAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_85993.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.63, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  33.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCAGUAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_20167.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -11.92, deficit  6.35, CutoffScore  30.39, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGCGGUGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -10.50, deficit  3.03, CutoffScore  21.58, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCCAAAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -7.51, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore  73.03, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUCCGCAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, CutoffScore  26.74, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCAAAUAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -4.79, deficit  0.00, CutoffScore 100.00, ed  0, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GUUACACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -7.55, deficit  0.97, CutoffScore  58.17, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUCGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.22, deficit  1.21, CutoffScore  42.09, ed  2, 2 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CAGGAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_57863.1,  8 NTs,            GAAGGAGGUC,score     -10.88, deficit  5.86, CutoffScore  32.40, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F                       
CACUAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20535.2,  6 NTs,              GAUAAUAC,score     -11.84, deficit  1.43, CutoffScore  21.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAUAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -8.41, deficit  2.36, CutoffScore  43.59, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GCAAAUGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -6.79, deficit  2.00, CutoffScore  58.23, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGCAGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.94, deficit  1.55, CutoffScore  52.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CUGAAAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_04259.3,  8 NTs,              CCUACAAG,score      -8.87, deficit  2.30, CutoffScore  44.22, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUAAAGCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score     -10.56, deficit  5.13, CutoffScore  37.69, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
GCCAAAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_77082.1,  8 NTs,              CCGAAAAG,score      -7.44, deficit -0.07, CutoffScore  73.65, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CAAAUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30068.2,  6 NTs,              UAAGCAUA,score      -6.31, deficit  0.26, CutoffScore  34.11, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
UGUGUUCA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.87, deficit  1.13, CutoffScore  31.16, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAGAAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_15574.1,  7 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.92, deficit  1.79, CutoffScore  50.18, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGGUCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -10.75, deficit  2.73, CutoffScore  47.38, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GUCUAGGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -8.84, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  34.12, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AGAUUUAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_42046.2,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -7.30, deficit  2.66, CutoffScore  53.30, ed  3, 1 cWW-tSS-F-F-F                           
CUCAUUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_25967.2,  7 NTs,               GUUUAUC,score      -8.77, deficit  4.33, CutoffScore  16.41, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
GUUGAAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -6.67, deficit  0.88, CutoffScore  63.75, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGUUCUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score      -8.34, deficit  0.61, CutoffScore  36.22, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUAGCUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78197.1,  8 NTs,              GGUUGGCC,score     -10.96, deficit  3.23, CutoffScore  39.88, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UUAACUGA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_85367.2,  8 NTs,             CUGGGGCGG,score     -12.30, deficit  7.56, CutoffScore  25.91, ed  2, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAAACCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -11.09, deficit  4.58, CutoffScore  27.50, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAAAAAGA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -9.06, deficit  2.62, CutoffScore  51.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGAAAUAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_02817.2,  6 NTs,              CCAAAUAG,score      -6.40, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  61.49, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
GGAAACUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_89567.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -6.29, deficit  2.37, CutoffScore  33.33, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUGGCAGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_30680.3,  7 NTs,               GACUGGC,score      -9.54, deficit  3.07, CutoffScore  67.70, ed  2, 0 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUCGGGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -9.03, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  13.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UCAUCGUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -8.56, deficit  3.12, CutoffScore  30.10, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
GGAUAAAC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_42998.2,  8 NTs,              GAAACAAC,score      -7.78, deficit  5.05, CutoffScore  35.38, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUCUUCGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59330.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score      -7.75, deficit  3.31, CutoffScore  60.05, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGCGUCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86769.4,  7 NTs,              AGGGUCAU,score     -14.60, deficit  6.58, CutoffScore  12.07, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-cSH-F                           
GUGGACAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_83632.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCCAGAU,score     -10.48, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  23.37, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUCCAAAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -7.67, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  69.09, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GGAUUGCAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score     -10.73, deficit  3.88, CutoffScore  23.59, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CAACAAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_72628.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -8.87, deficit  3.25, CutoffScore  31.83, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
AGUCCUUUU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32735.2,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score      -7.35, deficit  3.72, CutoffScore  42.45, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGGAAAUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -10.29, deficit  0.54, CutoffScore  36.00, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUCGGCUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -10.62, deficit  3.15, CutoffScore  20.51, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGACCGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -10.62, deficit  3.15, CutoffScore  20.51, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUGCUACGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_93438.2, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.98, deficit  6.69, CutoffScore  23.62, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAGUUUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.46, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  18.33, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW                                 
CUCAAAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80362.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score      -9.78, deficit  2.71, CutoffScore  17.00, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUCUAAUUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -9.67, deficit  4.91, CutoffScore  36.79, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GAUAAUCUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -11.70, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore  32.96, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAGAUAUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score      -9.87, deficit  2.13, CutoffScore  27.13, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GAUUGGAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_66853.7,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -11.93, deficit  4.59, CutoffScore  35.32, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-cSH                           
GAGACCACC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_38046.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.78, deficit  2.28, CutoffScore  43.27, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GUUAACAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_81538.2,  8 NTs,              GGUAACAC,score      -9.61, deficit  3.83, CutoffScore  36.26, ed  1, 1 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F                         
CGGAAACCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score     -10.19, deficit  3.35, CutoffScore   4.54, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UAGUCGGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -8.88, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  69.68, ed  2, 1 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
UGGGUUAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97983.1,  4 NTs,             AGGGAUUUU,score     -11.52, deficit  3.33, CutoffScore  18.71, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAAUGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -10.75, deficit  4.55, CutoffScore  15.30, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CGUAGAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -11.16, deficit  5.55, CutoffScore  19.53, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
UUUUAAUUA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01609.3,  7 NTs,              CUGGAAAG,score      -8.85, deficit  4.09, CutoffScore  43.33, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CUUAGAAUG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -8.91, deficit  3.48, CutoffScore  50.38, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CGGGAAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_18565.1,  8 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -11.50, deficit  6.33, CutoffScore  25.45, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGAUUGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.58, deficit  1.74, CutoffScore  40.18, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGCGGUAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -12.66, deficit  4.57, CutoffScore  17.60, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUUUAUUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.09, deficit  2.72, CutoffScore  21.85, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CGCUGUAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80599.2,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.60, deficit  5.30, CutoffScore  19.92, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGCAAGGCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93324.4,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -12.24, deficit  4.85, CutoffScore  17.35, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAUUCCCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_80241.1,  9 NTs,             UGGUUUCCA,score      -8.60, deficit  1.75, CutoffScore  40.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGUUUCAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score      -9.67, deficit  2.29, CutoffScore  26.67, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUGAAACCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_27670.2,  6 NTs,             GUGACAGCC,score      -7.69, deficit  2.26, CutoffScore  59.68, ed  1, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F                             
CUUAGUAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_21372.1,  5 NTs,             UUUCGUGUG,score      -9.96, deficit  1.71, CutoffScore  61.15, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-cSH-F-F                           
GUCUUAGUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -10.15, deficit  1.23, CutoffScore  43.98, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
GUUUCUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_28075.1,  7 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.57, deficit  0.75, CutoffScore  31.78, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUACGGCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score     -10.11, deficit  2.64, CutoffScore  24.95, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGUUGAAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_50318.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score     -10.80, deficit  4.79, CutoffScore  37.44, ed  1, 1 cWW-cSH-F-F                             
CCAGGAAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.94, deficit  3.85, CutoffScore  22.02, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUAACAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_80008.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -8.69, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  39.28, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CUAAUUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38808.1,  4 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score     -11.10, deficit  2.18, CutoffScore  36.60, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW                                 
CGAAAGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.27, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  33.94, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUAAAGAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -14.08, deficit  8.26, CutoffScore  28.81, ed  3, 1 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CCACGGUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_22622.1,  6 NTs,             CGACGGUUG,score      -9.01, deficit  1.54, CutoffScore  60.55, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
UUAGAGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_64690.6,  8 NTs,             GAAGACGAC,score     -11.97, deficit  5.55, CutoffScore   9.93, ed  4, 2 cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F                         
CUGGUUCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50537.6,  5 NTs,             ACUGUUAAU,score      -9.14, deficit  1.06, CutoffScore  10.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAAAAUUCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score      -8.82, deficit -0.92, CutoffScore  50.33, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAAAAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_13529.1,  7 NTs,               UUAACUG,score      -6.68, deficit  0.24, CutoffScore  71.78, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CGUCGUAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.52, deficit  2.44, CutoffScore  48.77, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAGUGGGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_04642.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score      -8.55, deficit  0.68, CutoffScore  62.78, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CCGACAUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -15.19, deficit  6.88, CutoffScore  13.89, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGAAGUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.83, deficit  5.01, CutoffScore  30.36, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
CAGUUGUGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20811.4,  5 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score      -7.77, deficit  0.25, CutoffScore  68.86, ed  1, 1 cWW-cWS-F                               
CGAGGGACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55436.1, 10 NTs,            GGUCCCAGAC,score     -10.18, deficit  2.11, CutoffScore  32.61, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UGAAAAGAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -14.32, deficit  4.98, CutoffScore  17.83, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGAAGAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -10.46, deficit  2.14, CutoffScore   5.46, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCUCAUAAUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_24792.1,  6 NTs,            GCCCGUUAUC,score      -9.47, deficit  3.04, CutoffScore  32.15, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWS-F-F-F                           
ACAUUAGUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_69139.1,  9 NTs,            UCUUUUAUUG,score     -14.17, deficit  4.16, CutoffScore  13.19, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCUCGUCCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07951.3,  4 NTs,             CAGCGGAAG,score     -14.99, deficit  5.26, CutoffScore   8.31, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F                                 
UGAAAUUAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -14.65, deficit  5.30, CutoffScore  15.37, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUGAUGUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18978.1,  9 NTs,            CUGUUCGCAG,score     -12.78, deficit  6.60, CutoffScore   0.92, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F                       
AUUAAAUAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.91, deficit  1.56, CutoffScore  20.91, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCUUGCUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86012.1,  8 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -11.17, deficit  8.08, CutoffScore   9.55, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
AUAAAAACCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.06, deficit  6.73, CutoffScore  20.15, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUAUGAUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -16.73, deficit  7.68, CutoffScore   3.92, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUAAAGCUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.21, deficit  7.87, CutoffScore  14.34, ed  3, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGGAUAGCGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_77600.2,  7 NTs,            GGUAAAUUCC,score     -13.28, deficit  3.53, CutoffScore  36.09, ed  1, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
GUGGAAUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.29, deficit  4.95, CutoffScore  29.19, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAAAUUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.5,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score     -11.37, deficit  6.01, CutoffScore  19.94, ed  3, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GCCAAAGGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75293.5, 10 NTs,            AGGUGAAAUU,score     -15.07, deficit  6.75, CutoffScore  14.75, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUAAAAAUCA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81545.2,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -11.28, deficit  7.00, CutoffScore  27.47, ed  3, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                         
UUGAUCAAUA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.31, deficit  4.26, CutoffScore  23.61, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUCGUGUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_53454.2,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.76, deficit  1.61, CutoffScore  29.48, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCUUUUACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25061.1,  5 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -14.30, deficit  5.57, CutoffScore  11.54, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F                             
CUUUAAGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_41464.2,  7 NTs,             GUGUAAAAC,score     -10.80, deficit  2.77, CutoffScore  19.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
AUGAAAGAGU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -11.14, deficit  5.32, CutoffScore  28.41, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
GGAUAAACAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -12.17, deficit  3.91, CutoffScore  37.72, ed  2, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
AUUGGCACGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99867.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -12.80, deficit  4.22, CutoffScore   6.87, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAUGUUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_45175.1,  6 NTs,            CAGUUGGUAG,score     -14.16, deficit  7.03, CutoffScore  16.79, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWS-F-F                             
CGAUGUUUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35677.3,  9 NTs,            UGAUUUGCUA,score     -12.08, deficit  4.71, CutoffScore  10.96, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGGCAUAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.84, deficit  6.50, CutoffScore   6.09, ed  6, 4 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AACGCAGAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score      -9.68, deficit  4.60, CutoffScore  22.79, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
UCGACACUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02887.3, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.05, deficit  7.71, CutoffScore  15.17, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUAUUCCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score      -8.37, deficit  2.78, CutoffScore  69.42, ed  3, 1 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUGACAGGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_29762.1,  7 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.54, deficit  4.50, CutoffScore   4.97, ed  4, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGGAUCGUGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_61996.2,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.42, deficit  6.61, CutoffScore  20.30, ed  4, 2 cWW-tWH-F-F-F                           
UGAAACCAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -10.19, deficit  0.85, CutoffScore  48.71, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUCCACGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83808.4,  7 NTs,             CUCCUCGCG,score     -11.59, deficit  6.02, CutoffScore  15.78, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F                           
GGAAAUUAGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -12.50, deficit  3.15, CutoffScore  31.47, ed  2, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAUCAGGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -12.18, deficit  5.98, CutoffScore  25.08, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
UUAGCAACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50779.4,  9 NTs,            GAAGCAACGC,score     -11.66, deficit  6.58, CutoffScore  45.61, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GUCUCUUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_15802.1,  7 NTs,             ACUCUGGAU,score     -13.37, deficit  7.16, CutoffScore  17.70, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F                           
CAAAGUCAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  25.36, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
GCAAAUGGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -10.37, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  25.00, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUAAAUCUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89881.5, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -11.48, deficit  6.66, CutoffScore  21.69, ed  3, 3 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UAAUAAAAACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score      -8.68, deficit  0.42, CutoffScore  40.78, ed  4, 3 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
GAAUUGCGGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.60, deficit  4.83, CutoffScore  23.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
UUAUCACUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -16.64, deficit  7.34, CutoffScore   1.17, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
GUCAUGUAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score     -11.83, deficit  4.54, CutoffScore  17.83, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F                         
GUUGUUGUCUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.70, deficit  2.93, CutoffScore  34.52, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UCAGAAUCCGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -14.62, deficit  5.85, CutoffScore   2.06, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
CUUUAUUGGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.7, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.06, deficit  7.83, CutoffScore  15.86, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCAUGAGCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -13.25, deficit  5.44, CutoffScore  15.64, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGCGAACUCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -11.67, deficit  1.05, CutoffScore  18.13, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGCAAUUAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -15.62, deficit  6.18, CutoffScore  23.89, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
CCGAAAUUAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -11.96, deficit  2.61, CutoffScore  35.52, ed  4, 2 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AGUUUGAGUUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.77, deficit  2.16, CutoffScore  30.01, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GGUACUAGACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -20.57, deficit  9.79, CutoffScore  17.42, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GAGAAGUCUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49941.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGUGGUUAG,score     -13.82, deficit  5.74, CutoffScore   1.97, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAAAGGAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_74292.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -14.23, deficit  7.15, CutoffScore  19.76, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CCGUUCUCGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36684.4, 11 NTs,           GACUUUUAAUC,score     -14.80, deficit  6.99, CutoffScore   6.58, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGUCAACUCAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85434.1, 10 NTs,            GGUAUCCCAC,score     -15.45, deficit  9.86, CutoffScore   0.24, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GUUGCGGUGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -12.87, deficit  3.99, CutoffScore  27.82, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUAGGUCAACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -16.20, deficit  6.76, CutoffScore  21.00, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
UGUAUCAGGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -10.82, deficit  1.53, CutoffScore  18.20, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CGAUUUCGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.04, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  31.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGAAAGAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -11.90, deficit  2.56, CutoffScore  13.44, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGACACGGAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.73, deficit  6.95, CutoffScore  20.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F                     
GGUCUGGCUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -12.08, deficit  2.53, CutoffScore  27.56, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CAGAAUAAUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.70, deficit  5.69, CutoffScore  18.87, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GACACAGAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.81, deficit  5.06, CutoffScore   4.33, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CAGAGAAUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -11.23, deficit  1.88, CutoffScore  18.51, ed  4, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUGUUUUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_34964.1,  9 NTs,           AGAGGGGCUUU,score     -13.32, deficit  3.76, CutoffScore  19.82, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CUUCUCGAAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.99, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore  44.43, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
ACAAAAAAAAU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.23, deficit  3.57, CutoffScore  25.47, ed  5, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
CUUUAUUAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_01962.2,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -10.18, deficit  3.52, CutoffScore  25.76, ed  4, 3 cWW-tWH-tWH-F                           
GUGCUUGGAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -10.54, deficit  3.56, CutoffScore  46.94, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GAAAAAUUAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20781.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score      -9.04, deficit  1.17, CutoffScore  69.26, ed  3, 1 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGAUAAAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -13.39, deficit  5.13, CutoffScore  30.05, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
CAAUUUUCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70751.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -10.04, deficit  3.30, CutoffScore  31.99, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
CGCGAAAUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_18423.1,  7 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score     -12.68, deficit  3.39, CutoffScore   6.95, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-tHS-F                           
CGAAUACACAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -13.62, deficit  4.62, CutoffScore  41.39, ed  3, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUUGGACAUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87463.1,  9 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -12.67, deficit  7.06, CutoffScore  27.76, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F                       
UGCUGAAAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -12.84, deficit  5.79, CutoffScore  14.53, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
AAGCGUACGCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73255.1,  6 NTs,            CAGCACUUUG,score     -14.14, deficit  6.40, CutoffScore  18.82, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
CGUGAAAGCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19210.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.04, deficit  7.23, CutoffScore  10.27, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCGGACAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -14.42, deficit  6.33, CutoffScore   6.93, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F                         
CGAGUACAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -14.32, deficit  5.32, CutoffScore  20.96, ed  4, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUAUCGAUAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -14.42, deficit  6.09, CutoffScore  15.35, ed  5, 3 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UGGAAAUCAUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68257.1, 11 NTs,        AAACGCUUGCGUUU,score     -17.02, deficit  8.02, CutoffScore   6.05, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CGUUCAGAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -12.14, deficit  3.81, CutoffScore  28.14, ed  3, 3 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
UAACUGGUCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -17.72, deficit  8.96, CutoffScore   1.48, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UUGUGCCGCGUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -16.78, deficit  7.90, CutoffScore   6.11, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
UUUCUAAUAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -16.90, deficit  6.29, CutoffScore   4.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
AUAAACUCUUAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_25847.2, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUAAC,score     -14.79, deficit 10.45, CutoffScore   2.74, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F                     
CUGAAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_53504.3, 10 NTs,          CGAAGUCAUAAG,score     -13.32, deficit  3.97, CutoffScore   2.87, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CAUCGUAAAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -15.01, deficit  7.96, CutoffScore  19.34, ed  4, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F                   
CUGUGCCGCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -16.76, deficit  7.88, CutoffScore   6.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GCAAAAUAGUAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.65, deficit  4.54, CutoffScore   1.03, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
GGGUGUCCAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_94376.1, 11 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -13.12, deficit  5.35, CutoffScore   4.46, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GCGGAAUUGAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -17.59, deficit  8.82, CutoffScore   2.20, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
GGUGAAGGAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16991.1,  8 NTs,          UGUGGAGGAGUA,score     -16.53, deficit 10.06, CutoffScore   2.34, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F                     
GGUUUGCGGUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_41543.1, 10 NTs,          GUGCAGCCCGUC,score     -15.55, deficit  6.67, CutoffScore  12.94, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
CUCAACACUAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.79, deficit  4.68, CutoffScore  18.12, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AUAAAAGUCAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_91939.2, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.03, deficit  5.96, CutoffScore  22.83, ed  5, 3 cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F                   
UAUCAAAAUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -15.06, deficit  4.32, CutoffScore  25.34, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CUUAAAAAUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.09, deficit  4.01, CutoffScore  19.04, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
GCCGAGCAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_06226.4,  9 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -12.28, deficit  4.20, CutoffScore  18.08, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CUCGAAUAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -14.63, deficit  3.89, CutoffScore  10.91, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UGUGAGGUUACA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_74379.3,  9 NTs,          GCAAGGUUAACC,score     -14.64, deficit  5.20, CutoffScore  13.76, ed  5, 4 cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F                   
GUUCUGUGAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_91503.7,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -14.41, deficit  7.42, CutoffScore   8.83, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CCGGCGUGUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_23115.1,  7 NTs,           CAGGCGGUUAG,score     -14.79, deficit  8.07, CutoffScore  26.04, ed  2, 2 cWW-F-F-F-F-F                           
CGAGCCAUCGUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38649.1, 10 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.85, deficit  2.74, CutoffScore  11.77, ed  5, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAUUUAAUUUUU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67079.1,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.73, deficit  2.12, CutoffScore  30.26, ed  3, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                       
CGAAUGAUCAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_40252.4,  7 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -17.15, deficit  6.90, CutoffScore   2.86, ed  3, 3 cWW-tSH-cWS-F                           
CGUGCCAUGUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.47, deficit  3.70, CutoffScore   2.23, ed  6, 5 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
GCCGAAUAAUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_99769.3,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -17.88, deficit  9.11, CutoffScore   0.61, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F                         
UCUCGAGUAAAA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01255.1,  8 NTs,          CAUCCAGUAAAG,score     -11.13, deficit  2.79, CutoffScore  50.67, ed  4, 2 F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
GGAAGGGGAAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -13.93, deficit  5.63, CutoffScore   6.63, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
GGAAGUUAGAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68767.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -11.68, deficit  3.38, CutoffScore   2.67, ed  5, 5 cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F                       
CAUGGUUAAACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.04, deficit  5.64, CutoffScore  24.23, ed  5, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
AUAAAUGCGUUUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -15.42, deficit  2.20, CutoffScore  25.24, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CAAAAUACAAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07583.1, 12 NTs,       UGGAAUUGGUAGACA,score     -15.29, deficit  2.07, CutoffScore   6.10, ed  6, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
CGUGUGGACACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_11542.1, 10 NTs,         CGAGCGGCCAAAG,score     -15.05, deficit  5.52, CutoffScore   2.45, ed  4, 4 cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F                     
AAAGAAAGACAGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_16398.2,  8 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -15.00, deficit  2.85, CutoffScore  13.00, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F                         
AAAUUAAAAACUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -13.49, deficit  3.09, CutoffScore  21.88, ed  4, 4 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
AUUUAUAAAAAUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_60266.1,  9 NTs,           GGAUAAAAGAC,score     -11.48, deficit  3.22, CutoffScore  42.06, ed  4, 2 cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F                     
UAAUCCGUACCAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -13.73, deficit  4.41, CutoffScore  29.71, ed  5, 3 cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F                 
CAUUCAAUGUUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_70658.1, 12 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -14.29, deficit  3.52, CutoffScore  18.86, ed  6, 4 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                   
AGAAUCGACUCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05304.3, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.07, deficit  5.67, CutoffScore  24.08, ed  3, 3 cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F               
CAGGGUAUAAAUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20751.2, 13 NTs,        CAGGGGAGGAAUCG,score     -15.73, deficit  7.11, CutoffScore   0.90, ed  4, 4 cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F               
GUGCAGAAAAUGAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78284.1, 10 NTs,          UUCAGAGAUGAG,score     -18.66, deficit  7.92, CutoffScore   5.14, ed  5, 3 cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F                 
UGAAACUUGGAAGGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_73183.1, 14 NTs,    CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG,score     -17.18, deficit  6.96, CutoffScore   2.55, ed  6, 4 cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F           
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc[10 10]	 92.0000	  6.0000	  0.0000
[11 11]	 88.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[12 12]	 60.0000	  2.0000	  0.0000
[13 13]	 24.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[14 14]	  4.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[15 15]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[16 16]	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[17 17]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[18 18]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[19 19]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[20 20]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[21 21]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[22 22]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[23 23]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[24 24]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[25 25]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[26 26]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[27 27]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[4 4]	100.0000	 74.0000	 70.0000
[40 40]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[41 41]	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000
[5 5]	100.0000	100.0000	 58.0000
[6 6]	100.0000	 86.0000	 52.0000
[7 7]	100.0000	 54.0000	 26.0000
[8 8]	100.0000	 34.0000	  4.0000
[9 9]	 98.0000	 16.0000	  0.0000
[total_length strand_lengths] Matchperc GoodMatchperc CoreEditZeroperc




Model HL_10456.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cWW-tWW-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCAGGGGAGGAAUCGG
Model HL_12758.3  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-cHW-F-F-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-F-tSH-F-cHW-F-cWH-cWH, sequence CGAAGGUGAGGAGAGGCGAGGAAGAG
Model HL_13971.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-tSW-F-tSH-tSH-cWW-F-F, sequence UUCCCGUCCGAUCA
Model HL_14757.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSW-tWW-cWW-tHW-tSW-F-cWH-F, sequence CCUGACUUCUAUACUAAG
Model HL_21400.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tSW-cWW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH, sequence AGGUGGGUGGUGUGGAGGAGUAU
Model HL_35354.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cHW-F-cWH-cHW-F-F-tHH-cWH-tWW-cWH-F-tWW-cWH-F-cWH, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_51921.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tSS-tHS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAAUUGCAGAUAUUCGUGAA
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWS-F-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_60293.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWH-F-cWH-cHW-cHW-cWH-cHW-cWH-F-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_64292.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCCCAUUCGGGUCU
Model HL_66482.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWW-F-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAUCCGAGUUGCAAGAG
Model HL_73916.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUAGCUCAGUCGGUAGAGCAGGGGAUUGAAAAUUCCGAGU
Model HL_74055.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-cWH-tSH-tHW-tHW-tSW, sequence CUGAAAGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_97756.2  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cSH-cWS-F-tSW-cSW-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence UACCCAUCCCGAACA
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_02581.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.32%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-tSW-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_07903.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_33074.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.31%,  22 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_73247.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.63%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUACACGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_81205.3  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_85461.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAGCCAUUUAUGGCGAAC
Model HL_89346.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAAGGGGGCAACUCCAUCU
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_99324.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_88364.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.72%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_91641.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_84847.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-tWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGCAACCAUCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.19%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_50851.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAGGCGGUUGGU
Model HL_63355.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.17%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_29958.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-F-cSS-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_73183.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_20751.2  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_31581.6  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.55%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cHS-F-F-F-cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_41902.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_04725.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS-cWW-cWW-cWS, sequence GUUACUUAGUUC
Model HL_11542.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGCGGCCAAAG
Model HL_15118.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.67%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_93616.2  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.52%,   8 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_23509.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.35%,   1 instances, signature cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAUUCAUUUUC
Model HL_68572.1  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_68767.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSH-cWS-F, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_07583.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_89881.5  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_55305.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_07480.2  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_81312.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.51%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_45785.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence GUUCCCUCACC
Model HL_24792.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F-F, sequence GCCCGUUAUC
Model HL_74379.3  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGUUAACC
Model HL_80411.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCCGGUAG
Model HL_16398.2  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_23115.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_16991.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWH-cWH-F-cWH-F, sequence UGUGGAGGAGUA
Model HL_70751.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_09260.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_01255.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCAGUAAAG
Model HL_32735.2  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_93383.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCCCUAAGC
Model HL_70658.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_05304.3  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_25847.2  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.06%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-tHW-F-F-F, sequence GUAACUAUAAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-cSH-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_47732.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_74292.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.13%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F-F, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_88558.1  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_04171.7  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.78%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_85434.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAUCCCAC
Model HL_94376.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_78284.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGAGAUGAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_19210.3  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_28252.8  matched a sequence  61 times, TP  97.86%, TN  96.02%, 140 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCAAGUC
Model HL_23010.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_93135.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_41543.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGCAGCCCGUC
Model HL_36684.4  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUUUUAAUC
Model HL_50418.1  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAGGCAC
Model HL_67407.5  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACCGUCUGG
Model HL_68257.1  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAACGCUUGCGUUU
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH-F-F, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_42998.2  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAAC
Model HL_20781.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_29129.3  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_49941.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGUGGUUAG
Model HL_97983.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_38649.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_50779.4  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGCAACGC
Model HL_40252.4  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSH-cWS-F, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_34964.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGAGGGGCUUU
Model HL_06226.4  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_37369.2  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   9 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_18978.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-tHW-F-F-F, sequence CUGUUCGCAG
Model HL_69139.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UCUUUUAUUG
Model HL_73255.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_91939.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHH-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_81545.2  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_91503.7  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_02887.3  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_83808.4  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tWW-F-F-F, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_06059.6  matched a sequence 107 times, TP  98.04%, TN  96.01%,  51 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCCCAAG
Model HL_89199.2  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_80599.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_87463.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_99769.3  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_99867.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_55436.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCCCAGAC
Model HL_58224.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_59330.1  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_04641.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAGACGACG
Model HL_01962.2  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tWH-tWH-F, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_98864.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_29762.1  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_88205.2  matched a sequence 121 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWS-tSW-F-F, sequence ACGUGCAAAU
Model HL_04642.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_18423.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-tHS-F, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_60266.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAAAAGAC
Model HL_67667.2  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_80241.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGGUUUCCA
Model HL_80362.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_86012.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_99040.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUGCGG
Model HL_85367.2  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUGGGGCGG
Model HL_51447.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAGUCG
Model HL_57863.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cWH-cWH-F, sequence GAAGGAGGUC
Model HL_73266.9  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  13 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSW-cSH-F, sequence GCCUUAAAC
Model HL_07951.3  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAGCGGAAG
Model HL_36335.1  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSS-cSS-F, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_09452.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGGGGCUA
Model HL_85993.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_22584.6  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  26 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_45175.1  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_34617.5  matched a sequence 150 times, TP  98.25%, TN  96.01%,  57 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_38046.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_53454.2  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_67079.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_80008.1  matched a sequence 151 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-cSH-F, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_35677.3  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUUUGCUA
Model HL_83632.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUCCAGAU
Model HL_37824.7  matched a sequence 154 times, TP  97.42%, TN  95.93%, 349 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50860.2  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-cWH-F-F-F-F, sequence GUCGGACAU
Model HL_21372.1  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH-F-F, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_22622.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACGGUUG
Model HL_15802.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUCUGGAU
Model HL_53504.3  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAAGUCAUAAG
Model HL_72628.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_77600.2  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAAUUCC
Model HL_26934.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_28791.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.03%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_47787.2  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAUCCCG
Model HL_47854.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_84299.4  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAGUGGC
Model HL_18565.1  matched a sequence 180 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_33983.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_20743.5  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_66853.7  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_86883.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.79%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_25967.2  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_89893.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.80%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGAGCG
Model HL_89567.2  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_42046.2  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   5 instances, signature cWW-tSS-F-F-F, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_61996.2  matched a sequence 191 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_27670.2  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  13 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F, sequence GUGACAGCC
Model HL_75293.5  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AGGUGAAAUU
Model HL_93438.2  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_81538.2  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  16 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAACAC
Model HL_15574.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_02817.2  matched a sequence 195 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CCAAAUAG
Model HL_00914.1  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUCAAAC
Model HL_01609.3  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  18 instances, signature cWW-tWH-F-F-F, sequence CUGGAAAG
Model HL_25061.1  matched a sequence 206 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_64690.6  matched a sequence 210 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-cSW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAAGACGAC
Model HL_38808.1  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   4 instances, signature cWW-cWW, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_59735.5  matched a sequence 214 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.84%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_78197.1  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUUGGCC
Model HL_99748.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-cSH, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_08100.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUCGCG
Model HL_30680.3  matched a sequence 226 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.43%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_77082.1  matched a sequence 227 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAAAG
Model HL_10540.1  matched a sequence 229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.83%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCGAAGG
Model HL_10453.3  matched a sequence 232 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Model HL_37344.1  matched a sequence 237 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCAUUCGG
Model HL_28075.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_56676.1  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.45%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_13529.1  matched a sequence 247 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UUAACUG
Model HL_50318.1  matched a sequence 247 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-F-F, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_49922.4  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.09%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_20167.2  matched a sequence 249 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_04259.3  matched a sequence 250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CCUACAAG
Model HL_30068.2  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.53%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAAGCAUA
Model HL_26631.1  matched a sequence 255 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.40%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_41464.2  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUGUAAAAC
Model HL_50537.6  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_20811.4  matched a sequence 274 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F, sequence CAGUUGGUAG
Model HL_77436.5  matched a sequence 274 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  23 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUAAUUG
Model HL_86769.4  matched a sequence 276 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-cWW-cSH-F, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_39243.1  matched a sequence 299 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_78347.4  matched a sequence 301 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.86%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_65313.1  matched a sequence 303 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CCUUUG
Model HL_71391.1  matched a sequence 306 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93324.4  matched a sequence 330 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.51%,  24 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F-F, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_76094.1  matched a sequence 333 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cWS-F-F, sequence CAAUG
Model HL_87553.1  matched a sequence 337 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.81%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_87954.2  matched a sequence 358 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.35%,   7 instances, signature cWW-tSW-F, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_31585.4  matched a sequence 381 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.04%,  20 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F-F, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_62934.1  matched a sequence 393 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_20535.2  matched a sequence 394 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.69%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GAUAAUAC
Model HL_52953.3  matched a sequence 398 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.85%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_29966.1  matched a sequence 406 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_55195.3  matched a sequence 433 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.67%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_80922.2  matched a sequence 437 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.40%,   3 instances, signature cWW-tSH-F, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_66103.1  matched a sequence 456 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.50%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_13963.3  matched a sequence 488 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.41%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGCGAC
Model HL_59843.1  matched a sequence 498 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.05%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UCAAUGA
Model HL_65794.5  matched a sequence 499 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.49%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence UGAUCA
Model HL_97917.2  matched a sequence 507 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.79%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_43517.1  matched a sequence 523 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_22135.1  matched a sequence 590 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UCCAA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 599 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_46501.1  matched a sequence 606 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.12%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cWS, sequence CUGAAG
Model HL_80709.3  matched a sequence 614 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.74%,  11 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_81100.2  matched a sequence 653 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.51%,   3 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_57176.2  matched a sequence 675 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,  14 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GCUGAUC
Model HL_32392.1  matched a sequence 704 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_07886.3  matched a sequence 751 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.83%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_82710.2  matched a sequence 790 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.55%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_93535.1  matched a sequence 812 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.65%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCG
Model HL_94980.1  matched a sequence 846 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUUG
Model HL_86870.2  matched a sequence 869 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUUC
Model HL_57875.1  matched a sequence 885 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.70%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GGUUUC
Model HL_35941.1  matched a sequence 995 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.86%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_27483.1  matched a sequence 1000 times, TP 100.00%, TN  80.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence GCUUCUGC
Model HL_38901.2  matched a sequence 1033 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.36%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_38168.1  matched a sequence 1047 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.17%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CAAAG
Model HL_48778.2  matched a sequence 1080 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.10%,  46 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCGUG
Model HL_69752.2  matched a sequence 1184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.63%,   7 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_78677.1  matched a sequence 1229 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUCG
Model HL_04783.2  matched a sequence 1250 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence CGAAAG
Model HL_50006.2  matched a sequence 1280 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.03%,   5 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_48417.5  matched a sequence 1489 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.33%,  26 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_32346.4  matched a sequence 1490 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.41%,   9 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_53890.2  matched a sequence 1679 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.39%,  15 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_13189.1  matched a sequence 1686 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.64%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CCUCGG
Model HL_56334.1  matched a sequence 1819 times, TP 100.00%, TN  57.50%,  16 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_75660.5  matched a sequence 1841 times, TP 100.00%, TN  61.35%,  19 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CACAG
Model HL_70782.2  matched a sequence 1992 times, TP 100.00%, TN  62.65%,   4 instances, signature cWW-F, sequence CCUCAG
Model HL_56131.2  matched a sequence 2035 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.39%,   6 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence GCUGCGAAC
Overall false positive rate is 1.9638%
Number of models giving false positives is 238 out of 253
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     0.48
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is     0.85
